As I tell people: If someone would have - back in 2018 or earlier -
come up to you (anyone alive today or then) ... and said "There will be
a virus, that
will make all businesses close, and everyone will
be wearing masks..." everyone would have had them
COMMITTED. Now we all know how Noah
felt. Everybody
dismissed him as "NUTS!" [since people have confirmation bias,
yet they
think *I* have Confirmation bias!] but Noah did
know.
Remember: "misinformation"
(“conspiracy theories”) were once
understood to be the driving force of world history, both for good or
for evil, today’s dumbed-down
populous has
increasingly become induced
to believe that the term is synonymous with either insanity at best, or
domestic terrorism at worst.Also, see my Christian
section about UFOs.
2017 - three US Navy Pilots testified - under oath:
David Grusch
[Mr] Graves
Commander Fravor
They ALL risked their carers - and told how they had PERSONALLY seen,
and intervened with these crafts, AND - their technology was EONS ahead
of ours, or anything we even had plans on. One craft - did NOT
appear on Government RADAR, yet the cameras captured it - going over
300
knots - AGAINST a 120 know wind. That's 420 knots!! It
rotated WHILE going that speed, with it going SIDEWAYS!
This would be IMPOSSIBLE for any of our aircraft to do. If
you need a link, let me know - they are removed shortly after posting,
so what does THAT tell you? A: The US Government LIES
to it's people, and controls YouTube, FB, etc.
The Pilots did not mention S-3 (it's Classified), as if you DO, you are
DEAD. I can mention it here - I'm "small potatoes", not a NAVY
Pilot.
NOTE: so many that "know" [either way] also have The Dunning-Kruger Effect, as well as "Impostor
syndrome".
This is Bob Lazar's description of one of the
crafts he toured while at S-3 (near Area 51):
Before you dismiss ME as "nuts", let me remind you: Angels are
Aliens
(they don't live on Earth - they are invisible, and they never
die). God is also an Alien. NOW may we move forward??
Besides, read about the long, close ties The Government has had to
Aliens:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2A3LONAyEM
“I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just
been too intelligent to come here.”
- Arthur C. Clarke
Before I provide MY experiences, here
are a few
more "conspiracy theories" that people laughed at, and quickly
dismissed:
Conspiracy Theory, 1764
Indians / Natives / First Nation / Aboriginal: (did I cover them all,
not to offend anyone?)
Those weak people - they wouldn't last ONE WINTER here.
Theories:
I hear they are making an army and will take us over.
Ha!!!! And you BELIEVE that?? Oh, THEM stronger
than US?? THAT'LL be the day. Ha!!!!! Oh,
that's FUNNY!! Anybody who believes THAT - go make another
tribe - we won't stand for your INSANITY.
For those who don't believe in things you can't see (like air,
water, Infrared light, viruses, radiation, and love) - I'll call it
"evil". For those who don't believe "evil" exists, I have nothing
to say to them - since the definition of "evil" is "bad, not
good". Life must be GREAT for them - nothing is bad, or "not
good'. What a wonderful life. I'll hit them on the head
with this hammer, and they will LOVE it.
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1900
Hey, I hear they are replacing the horse - with a carriage that doesn't
need a horse!
And you BELIEVE that?? What drugs are you ON???
And they SAY it's gonna put us Blacksmiths out of business!
SERIOUSLY?? Blacksmiths out of a job?? THAT will be the
day!!! Don't be so GULLIBLE - that will NEVER happen.
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1950's
Cigarettes cause cancer!
My grandfather said "If anyone said this back then, you would first get
laughed at, then beaten up for "stupidity". Cigarettes are GOOD FOR
YOU!"
SPOILER alert:
My grandfather died from emphysema (cigarettes)
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1965
JFK never had any relations with Monroe! Where are you getting
your information from?? JFK is the PERFECT man!!
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1970
Area 51 exists.
Oh, it does NOT - you are listening to a bunch of ALUMINUM FOIL heads!!
2009 - the US Government ADMITTED that Area 51 exists.
2020 - the US Government admits they have Aliens at S-4.
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1980
Everyone KNEW the earth had run out of oil. There were SHOOTINGS
at pumps - because there was no more gasoline. I remember this
well!!
Some Conspiracy "idiots" said "there IS more fuel - they are just
keeping the tankers from coming to port." My Army Brother was one of
those "idiots", and we all know now - there IS oil.
SPOILER ALERT: they WERE keeping tankers in the Gulf of Mexico
.... I know - I was in the Armed Forces and we did fly-overs and saw
the HUNDREDS of tankers - waiting to get to port. They were NOT ALLOWED
by the Oil Companies - so they could CREATE an "oil shortage" and
increase the price. The price more than DOUBLED, and yes - they got
away with
it. Our mission was to keep Pirates from seizing any ship. And we
were commanded "This-s never happened". The time for silence is over!
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 1998/1999
Every hour of every day on the media:"The Y2K computer bug..."
SPOILER ALERT: The year 2000 (Y2K) did come, and computers were
updated. The earth did NOT stop, and here we are.
- - - - -
Normally I would do this one LAST, but:
Conspiracy Theory, 0033
A guy SUPPOSEDLY died, and then came to life again. They SAY he rose to
heaven,
and it gets even WORSE - they SAY he's coming again.
Ha!!!!! WHO actually BELIEVES this???? (Spoiler
alert: MILLIONS: Jesus)
- - - - -
Conspiracy Theory, 2018
This PLANdemic is to control population!
Seriously?? The Government has only our health in mind.
They would NEVER lie to us!!!
The “flat earth” new argument and “support”:
Job 38:14 - - in the original Hebrew:
תִּ֭תְהַפֵּךְ כְּחֹ֣מֶר חֹותָ֑ם וְ֝יִֽתְיַצְּב֗וּ כְּמֹ֣ו לְבֽוּשׁ׃
This means: "to turn or overturn
morter/clay/cement a seal or signet
ring to set on/take a stand
like/as
clothing/wardrobe"
Yeah, I guess that proves "the earth is flat": "Overturn morter a seal
take a stand like wardrobe”.
Isaiah 40:22 - the "flat earth proof in the Bible". (Hint: NOPE!)
(??) "there is one who dwells above the circle of the earth"
(NLT) "God sits above the circle of the earth."
(NIV) "He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth"
(KJV) "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth"
The 4 Hebrew words: הַיֹּשֵׁב֙ עַל־ ח֣וּג הָאָ֔רֶץ
Literally means "to sit/dwell/remain
upon/above/over
horizon/vault/circuit/compass the earth/land"
The key word here is ח֣וּג - pronounced "chuwg" or properly
"khoog" - directly translates _not to *circle*_ - but to:
horizon/vault/circuit/compass.
- - - - -
You ALL know: If anyone would have - back in 2018 or earlier - come up
to anyone
alive today ... and said "there will be a virus, that will make all
businesses close, and everyone will be wearing masks..."
all those alive today would have had them COMMITTED. Now we all
know how Noah felt.
Everybody dismissed him
as "NUTS!", but he
did know. I've been studying "Agenda 20/30", and the Communists
are
saying the
virus was "Step 1" (2020) to their 10-year plan to make the US and
Canada completely Communist by 2030. If you think I'm nuts, see:
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
https://swisscows.com/web?query=Agenda+20%2F30
https://metager.org/meta/meta.ger3?eingabe=Agenda+20%2F30
Just for fun: Einstein's actual original equation:
Einstein's theory of relativity -
Although it was NOT "his" theory .... he had a Mathematician do the
math.
There is no practical way to convert a paper clip or any other object
entirely to energy. It would require temperatures and pressures greater
than those at the core of our sun.
So, IT CANNOT BE PROVEN!! We just listen to Einy - as if he is
"God".
So why would you have to multiply the mass of that walnut by the speed
of light to determine how much energy is bound up inside it? The
reason
is that whenever you convert part of a walnut or any other piece of
matter to pure energy, the resulting energy is by definition moving at
the speed of light. Pure energy is electromagnetic radiation - whether
light or X-rays or whatever - and electromagnetic radiation travels at
a constant speed of 299.792458 km per second (~186,000 miles/sec).
Why, then, do you have to square the speed of light? It has to
do with the nature of energy. When something is moving four times as
fast as something else, it doesn't have four times the energy but
rather 16 times the energy—in other words, that figure is squared. So
the speed of light squared is the conversion factor that decides just
how much energy lies within a walnut or any other chunk of matter. And
because the speed of light SQUARED is a huge number: 90,000,000,000
(km/sec) ... the amount of energy bound up into even the
smallest mass is truly mind-boggling. Basically, a small
lump of coal - could easily power Manhattan, Los Angeles and Chicago
(combined) - for 6 months.
But again, it can't be proven ... so why do we use this as "gospel"?
Is E mc2 wrong? (A: Yes!)
Consider the units of mc2: [kg]·[m/s]2 = kg·m2/s2 = J
(joules).
The E=mc² equation - the E stands for energy (in Joules). the m and the
c, are mass in (Kilograms) and the speed of
light
in a vacuum (in Meter/second). The idea of mass and energy as equal
actually wasn’t Einstein’s, but what he did was to propose it as a
general principle. One very obvious application can be shown by just
looking at the formula. If we put only 1 kg into the equation, we would
get an energy equivalent of 89,875,517,873,681.800 Joules. That is more
than 1000 times the energy of the Atomic bomb that the US dropped over
Hiroshima at the end of WW2.
He never won a Nobel prize. Nominated over 60 times, but never
awarded (won). Also, Einstein has been credited with MANY quotes, but did NOT state or say any of these:
The difference between stupidity and genius is: genius has its limits
The Daily Caller News Foundation reached out to several
experts, none of whom could find the saying in his writings.
“There’s no source for this one, and so it’s probably not by Einstein,”
said Andrew Robinson, author of “Einstein: A Hundred Years of
Relativity,” in an email to the DCNF. A precursor to the expression
appeared in a late Century 19 French encyclopedic dictionary, according
to the website Quote Investigator. The work, entitled “Great Universal
Dictionary of the Nineteenth Century” in English, includes a saying
attributed to writer Alexandre Dumas fils under the entry “Stupidity.”
“One thing that humbles me deeply is to see that human genius has its limits while human stupidity does not,” it reads.
Certain People Appear Bright Until You Hear Them Speak
It appears in the “Probably Not By Einstein” section of Alice
Calaprice’s “The Ultimate Quotable Einstein,” a preeminent text on
sayings from Einstein.
https://blog.obiaks.com/230613061020/emc2-is-wrong-einsteins-special-relativity-fundamentally-flawed
http://net-teams.net/nti/Display.cfm/15171
Darkness is the absence of light, and that light travels at the fastest
speed possible for a physical object. … In short, it means that, the
moment that light leaves, darkness returns. In this respect, darkness
has the same speed as light.
The Speed of
Light / Light Speed
The speed of light is 299.792458 kilometers (km) per
second - or for you King fans out there, it is 186,292.3960 miles per
second. Some encyclopedias will list it as 299,808.55 meters per
second. Sorry - it's km, since many Americans don't even know
what a meter
is. Light travels through a vacuum at exactly 299,792,458 meters
per second, which for the Amerircans-still using Britains old
system-is 983,571,056 feet per second.
But imagine - 299,792.458 SQUARED. Just to save you the work, it
is 89,875,517,873,681.800
That's 89 billion, 875 million... so, a lump of coal (500 grams,
or 1 pound) - yields 89 billion x 500. That's 44 trillion, 937
billion, 758 million, 936 thousand, 500. And that's just ONE lump
of
coal.
Then there is Quantum Theory - which is THEORETICAL.
It takes 28 billion years - for light to travel from 1 side of the
universe - to the other .... and if it's expanding rapidly ...
that number is getting exponentially larger every second.
The Moon
The Moon is ~ 363,300 km - at the NEAREST (perihelion) point.
A quick question: can you see California from Florida - with a
telescope or good pair of binoculars? If so, can you see me
on my
bike? Yes, it's rhetorical, since it's less than 10% of the
distance that the moon is - in it's nearest part - to the
Earth. If you circle the earth 9 times, it's the same
distance. Again, if you can't see a chimpanzee in
Californnia with binoculars, or a telescope - from Florida,
.... see the point? Those of yo uwho have
angrily told me thi - you clearly have confirmation bias.
The Moon Landers claim:
The LRV was folded up into a package of 1 x 1 x 0.7 meters, and stored
on the outside of the LM descent stage. LRV deployment videos show how
the astronauts got the LRV down onto the surface. The LRV carried 2
batteries with a total capacity of 8 kWh, enough for about 90 km of
range, driving at up to 18 km/h.
Again, in summation: To actually see the supposed lander, we would need
a 240m telescope. That's 9,448 of The King's inches, or 262 yards (2.6
football fields). And many telescope owners claim
they can see it with binoculars. Again, it's "confirmation bias" - they
want to see it, so they make themselves see it.
Seeing the moon - which is 133 times the distance from Miami to Los
Angeles - if anyone can see a bicycle in Los Angeles - from Miami (they
can't), then it's 133 times harder than that. But everyone claims they
can see "the bike". [sigh]
The Apollo spacecraft used pure oxygen at a
pressure of 0.3 bar.
That already reduces the volume of air you need by a factor 5.
The exhaled CO2 went into LiOH scrubbers, where it reacted, removing
the CO2 from the exhaled air. This is similar to rebreathing systems
used by advanced divers.
A human will die from pure oxygen at pressures of 1 bar and above. The
Apollo systems were at 0.3 bar, not 1 bar. At 0.3 bar, pure oxygen is
safe to breathe.
Divers use lots of air because they are under water: their breathing
system has to supply air at a pressure higher than the surrounding
water. Your oxygen usage doesn't increase, so most of the air you
inhale is not used: only a tiny amount of oxygen is removed from it.
Simple diving systems dump all of that usable air overboard.
With a rebreather, you can use ALL of the oxygen instead of just a
fraction.
Being at 0.3 bar also meant you're not wasting lots of air.
Air tanks were installed in the Service Module, and in the Lunar Module
descent stage and ascent stage.
A human consumes 25-50 grams of oxygen per hour, so a crew of 3
requires 3.6 kg of oxygen per day, or 25 kg for an 8-day mission, 37 kg
for a 12-day mission.
The Lunar Module carried 23 kg of oxygen. The Service Module carried
297 kg of oxygen, which was used to supply the crew and run the fuel
cells.
This is more than enough for the missions.
MY NOTE: At rest, an average adult human body consumes
approximately 200 to 250 milliliters of oxygen per minute. It's
7,570 liters of air per day - 378 liters of pure oxygen per day.
it is measured by VOLUME, not weight, and for weight, there are MANY
variables.
Many even hit me with vitroyal: "we have pictures!!"
Do the math on what size aperture would be needed for the resolution to
spot a 0.5 meter object at the closest distance to the Moon." The
mirror needed was over 260 meters across. I also ask:
Why has it taken us 70 years to get photos? And with AI now, we can do
anything - have you seen the photos of aliens on the moon? The W2
bomber on the moon? They are on youtube. There are AI
videos of Trump, Putin and Zin Sing - dancing on the moon. They
ALL must be true!! (ha ha)
- One commenter writes:
I was a Space Shuttle astronaut instructor in the late 90s and worked
with John Young on a weekly basis since he was the Chief of the
astronaut office at the time. Since we were both military and graduates
of our respective test Pilot schools we spent a lot of time together
and discussed a LOT of things privately, including his moon mission. I
can assure you he and Duke did not find any alien anything on the moon.
Another doubting commenter adds:
yes their are just to many questions and too many impossible nuances
that they just try to ignore rather than point the technological
marvels they achieved. also for me when nasa has made official
statements as to why they had to fake the footage and admitting that
the moon rocks they gifted to friend nations were merely petrified
wood, then just what else was a lie?.. we will never get full
disclosure on that.. I also find it interesting that we couldn’t go to
the moon until the acquisition of ex-Nazi scientists and physicists who
were working on electro gravitic technology in Germany and Argentina..
MY take:
One would *think* that Elon Musk would have made a trip there already -
to take photos right there, and set up a solar-powered camera - that
could transmit the 400,000 km back to earth. You know - like they did
in 1969. The radio is pictured here:
https://www.righto.com/2022/05/talking-with-moon-inside-apollos.html
But the 28 volt power supply - which they had no way of recharging -
it's not even mentioned on that, or any other site - supposedly made
the 400,000 km trip to Earth. To put it into perspective, radio
stations need megawatts - to go from the transmitter - to the city
surrounding it. To get megawatts from 28V - ....
Show your work :-)
Everything "was a _miracle_ !!!" They could never get the
lander to land correctly in a controlled environment, but it worked
_perfectly_ - the first time - there. Yeah, I'm buying it. I also have
some cheap swamp land in Arizona - if you want to buy it. Very cheap.
The Moon Landing Deniers (like me) claim:
The book: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle
https://www.amazon.com/We-Never-Went-Moon-Americas/dp/1545393575
Bill Kaysing was head of the technical presentations unit at the Rocket Dyne Propulsion Field Laboratory
from 1956 to 1963. This period encompassed the major planning for the
engine and components of the Apollo project. During this time, Kaysing
held security clearances with the U.S. Air Force and the Atomic Energy
Commission.
Bill Kaysing, a former U.S. Naval Officer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories
The Moon Landings: A Giant Hoax for Mankind?
https://www.newsfromtheperimeter.com/home/2020/6/26/the-moon-landings-a-giant-hoax-for-mankind
73 percent of aged 25-34 believe we didn’t land on the moon,
compared to 38 percent of those aged 55 or more. These numbers seem to
be rising every year. British unbelievers were only 25 percent ten
years ago. It is not known how may they are today, but a 2018 poll by
the Russian Public Opinion Research Center revealed that 57 percent Russians believe that there has never been a manned lunar landing. The percentage rises to 69 percent among people with higher education: in other words, the more educated people are, and the more capable of rational reasoning, the less they believe in the moon landings.
In the US, the percentage seems much lower (due to confirmation bias):
A 1999 Gallup poll indicated just 6 percent Americans doubting the moon
landings, and a 2013 Pew Research showed the number to have risen to a
mere 7 percent. Not surprisingly, then, a 2010 Pew Research poll showed
that 63 percent of Americans were confident that NASA would land an
Astronaut on Mars by 2050.
https://www.pdfsdownload.com/download-pdf-for-free/mooned+america
The web recording boss Joe Rogan is among the sceptics. So too is the
YouTuber, Shane Dawson. A human science teacher in New Jersey was
uncovered a year ago for telling his understudies the arrivals were
phoney. While Kaysing depended on copied samizdat to alarm the world,
presently conspiracists have the subreddit r/moon hoax to archive how
Nasa was “so apathetic” it utilized a similar moon wanderer for Apollo
15, 16 and 17; or how “they have been savaging us for quite a long time”
Buzz Aldrin punched moon conspiracist Bart Sibrel in 2002. Russian
cosmonaut Alexei Leonov: "We trusted the folks would make it. We needed this to occur."
All things considered, you could see the diligence of the moon
connivance as a commendation to the Apollo researchers. says, Morton.
“It’s an indication that they truly care. They feel that Apollo truly
made a difference.” actually the moon arrivals didn’t generally change
life on Earth. Not yet at any rate.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/greatest-swindle-ever-sold/
Christians and UFO
belief
1) *Why* was the galaxy - much-less the universe
- created? If we are not to wonder about the cosmos? If we are in
the "last days", and it takes light 28 billion years to reach us - yet
the Universe is only a few thousand years old... That means
99.999999999% of creation was "a waste", as we'll never
see or discover it. Why??
2) As stated on my Translations page, the Greek word "world" is
incorrect - the Greek word for "world" - is "kosmos".
We are to "go unto all the COSMOS and preach the gospel. Don't
argue with ME - I'm just tthe one reading it CORRECTLY. Get mad
at THE TRANSLATORS!!
3) It's pretty interesting: people will believe in INVISIBLE
beings
(Angels, demons), and even the deep sea dwellers they've never seen
.... but they won't believe in the possibility of other entities from
another planet. It's ok, and all .... but I find it interesting. While
driving in a car, my mom, my Brother, and I all saw .... and we KNOW
what we saw. But we've had to only talk with each other over the 50
years since, because people tell us "No, you DIDN'T see that!" OK, fine
- we didn't. I now joke: "I don't exist. Earth doesn't
exist." Now I know how Jesus and his followers went
through. There is nothing wrong with believing that humanity
is
not alone in the
universe. The Bible, after all, makes it clear that God created
everything in the universe. That would include any form of alien life,
and the Bible never explicitly says that humans are the lone lifeforms
in the universe. (NOTE: see my section on BIBLE REFERENCES FOR LIFE ELSEWHRE!)That
said, belief in aliens does raise a number of
questions for Christians. The first and largest, of course, is how
aliens fit into Christians ideas about salvation. Did Jesus’ death save
every living being, or did it only affect humanity? If it was the
latter, does that mean that human Christians have a duty to evangelize
aliens, or did God incarnate repeatedly across various inhabited worlds
in order to save all of His creations? The belief systems of the
extraterrestrials might be able to answer that question. After all,
their religion may turn out to closely mirror Christianity.
See my giants
section. Yes, mentioned in Genesis, Numbers, and Ezekiel (NOW you
believe me??).
Another potential issue brought up by the existence of aliens would be
what that means for humanity’s position in God’s eyes. The Bible is
normally interpreted as placing humanity on a pedestal. The existence
of aliens would bring a new and dangerous dimension to that
interpretation. Continuing to hold that Homo sapiens are the pinnacle
of God’s plan would mean that humans are inherently more important and
worthy than a species that may be equally intelligent and sentient.
This would give rise to a terrible sort of species. Many people,
however, would find it inconsistent with the Bible to say that humanity
did not have a special place in God’s heart. That said, the existence
of alien life might suggest that it was not so much Homo sapiens who
were placed at the pinnacle of creation as much as intelligent life
being elevated above animals and plants. This would enable humans to
retain the sense of being made in the image of God without creating a
new form of racism. Ted Peters, Professor Emeritus in Theology at
Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary, pointed out that the “special”
is not used only to refer to unique phenomena. The discovery of alien
life would not necessarily compromise God’s love for humanity “just as
a parent’s love for a child is not compromised because that child has a
brother or sister.”
https://metager.org/meta/meta.ger3?eingabe=aliens in
the bible
Aliens in the Bible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-zpP-eicJo
NASA heard screams:
https://youtu.be/jvXh1Mcc6uk
UFO
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jtZGKYO7iyI?feature=share
In addition to the Book of
Enoch - that was omitted from The Canon (The Bible)... feel
free to watch this documentary:
The Pyramid Code
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3PIW7PUUvI
Keep in mind, this is NOT like "The Divinchi Code" - which MOCKS Jesus
and Christianity, and gives many false "facts". If you believe The Garden of Eden
existed, see this proof that it did, and still does.
I have many other documentaries and Christian Films listed on my movies
page.
Go back to
Jesus' day - when many said they saw him resurrect Lazarus (nobody
believed them!) or when he ascended to heaven 40 days after he was
crucified (nobody believed them!). One by one, the Jews of the
day - stopped believing, when Jesus did not come back "quickly".
Although
the original text reads "I will come back urgently" or "swiftly", it is
usually translated as 'quickly".
But FORGET me and my College grad Brother and my Nurse Mother. Will you
believe Russell Crowe? How about Buzz Aldrin?
Oh, these "idiots" didn't see what they claim!! YOU are right -
you "all-knowing orbs".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcpCA9qgVnY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVffyAF3wz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNkmhY_ju8o
How about OVER 1,200 PEOPLE IN PHOENIX, AZ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGMGOdKOPKk&t=227s
Go ahead and SAY it: They are ALL crazy!!! They did NOT see
this!!
We believe what 500 people said they saw, and wrote about 80 years
later (the crucifixion of Yeshua), but we don't believe what OVER
1200 people - with video cameras - saw *yesterday* ????? REALLY??
Not only has my Navy Cousin worked at S-3, but many (MANY) others have
... including the famous (and infamous) Bob Lazar.
The rhetorical
question could easily be: "Who are YOU to tell these Engineers that
they did NOT see or experience what they experienced?" Here's an
example: If you could go back in time, and gave a mobile (smart) phone
to someone - even in the 70's ... they would SCREAM, and everyone would
tell them that 'you didn't see that. You didn't experience that!"
"You're CRAZY!"
So, are we ALL "crazy" now???? The Wright Brothers DREAMED of what we
do EVERY DAY. Are WE "crazy"??
See this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IatqcKWrj9E
(especially watch it at 0:25)
Then watch these:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDj9ZZQY2kA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4D7o4H7qaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTaG9o_WgOI
Nobody believes *me*, (or my brother, or my mother (who were with me at
the sighting - we all still talk about this to this day), but we saw a
fast-moving craft - go across the moon in
1972. It went in a wavy
line, and very fast. After about 7 or 8 seconds, it went so fast across
the sky, then did a turn, and went straight up. If any human was
in that "experimental" craft - they are dead. Nobody could have
stood the G-force of going across the sky in .3 seconds, then turn up
and go to space in .3! No craft made in 2022 could have stood the
force - much-less in 1972.
I also saw a face peering in on me - in 1976 - in Florida. I was in the
washroom, and I heard something rustling in the bushes just outside of
the window. I looked, and a very large head - with slightly
glowing eyes - was looking in at me. Go ahead and laugh - next
time you watch a movie with special effects, I'm going to laugh at
*you*. The moon landing? Everyone in
1965 and earlier - are
saying "YOU didn't see that - what a CROCK!! What have YOU been
smoking???" Now that *you* see how *I* feel, I'll proceed.
When I saw that face in that window, I yelled, and it left
quickly. I went outside, and we all looked for it. I went
to the window, and to have looked through the window, it would have to
have been 2.5m (over 8') tall. Even my dad couldn't even reach
the bottom of the window.
So, when I hear Bob Lazar and Dr. Daniel Durich - not only RISK their
careers .... but LOOSE them - with DEATH THREATS .... yet they STILL
maintain what they saw at S-3 (near Area 51). Lazar worked on
recovered space crafts, and Durich worked with "J-Rod". Go ahead
- tell them that they didn't experience this for over a week. Go
ahead! As both are Navy physicists and micro biologists, you WILL
lose.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeV3Vx4qeg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IatqcKWrj9E
(especially watch it at 0:25)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_LfNaSrvAE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTaG9o_WgOI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4D7o4H7qaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpPMoIv1lxI
Bob Lazar:
https://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/bob-lazar-the-man-behind-area-51/80762763
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAeV3Vx4qeg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4D7o4H7qaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_LfNaSrvAE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTEZeY-fNCU
Dr. Dan Durish, Janet Airline, Majestic 12, UFO Series / J Rod
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IatqcKWrj9E
Bob Lazar and Durich's descriptions of Hanger 5 in S-3 ... match
exactly, as well as the humanoid ("J-Rod") that Durich met and
interacted / talked with. What does the Bible state about
UFOs?
Basically: And the earth was without form, and void". How long
was
that time for???? This is a great support of eons of
development.
Lazar doesn't miss the UFO craziness at all. Out here, he's almost
anonymous. He minces no words about whether he sticks by his story. "I
felt privileged to be part of the project and it was fascinating to be
in it in any way, shape, or form, but life moves on." And it's a
busy life at that: Lazar started United Nuclear, a scientific
supply company that sells a long list of stuff online to schools,
universities, even to government agencies and labs, things like cloud
chambers, radiation detectors, and uranium ore. Lazar says,
"We're consultants for a lot of companies. You get the strangest phone
calls, even from the Navy Seals, who say "we need a device like this to
go overboard and activate." They give specifications and ask can you
build it? We fabricate a prototype, get it to them, do a short
production run. By that time we get another call from another company
to make some bizarre equipment and really have a blast."
Speaking of blasts, his online ads selling pieces of uranium ore
understandably caught the attention of several government agencies,
especially since he also built a 760mm (30") long particle accelerator
behind his house. "Every government agency you could possibly
think of has been here and hassled us, and that includes the SWAT team
that woke my wife and I up at 06:00 and handcuffed us out on
the front lawn. After various agencies were assured that Lazar
wasn't building atomic weapons out behind the barn, agents calmed down.
A few pop by from time to time to see what he's up to. There's one
thing they don't talk about.
- - - -
"UFO" means "Unidentified Flying Object". Anything you can't
identify
- whether it be an asteroid or thrown rock - is a UFO. When it is
identified, it
ceased to be that .... unless it IS a "flying saucer"... then it is
a"craft", etc. Bob Lazar and Dr Durrich are the main notables who have
seen crafts from non-earth origins. Many don't believe them, and
insist they are lying. *I* tell those people: "What have YOU seen
today?" Even if it's a sunrise, I reply "Well, WE didn't see it , so we
don't believe you!"
It's pretty interesting: people will believe in INVISIBLE beings
(Angels, demons), and even the deep sea dwellers they've never seen
.... but they won't believe in the possibility of other entities from
another planet. It's ok, and all .... but I find it interesting. While
driving in a car, my mom, my Brother, and I all saw .... and we KNOW
what we saw. But we've had to only talk with each other over the 50
years since, because people tell us "No, you DIDN'T see that!" OK, fine
- we didn't. I now joke: "I don't exist. Earth doesn't
exist." Now I
know how Jesus and his followers went through.
But FORGET me and my College grad Brother or my Nurse Mother. Will you
believe Russell Crowe? How about Buzz Aldrin?
Oh, these "idiots" didn't see what they claim!! YOU are right -
you "all-knowing orbs".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcpCA9qgVnY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVffyAF3wz8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNkmhY_ju8o
- - - -
On a PERSONAL note: in Florida, 245
Ohio Rd - I was in the washroom, I
had just finished brushing my teeth, and I heard rustling in the
bushes
just outside my window. I looked at the window (which was high -
to
any person standing outside), and I saw a large head - with very eerie
eyes. I "dropped my jaw" for about 5 seconds, and seeing the
eyes
move, I YELLED for my brothers and father. We all "chased"
outside -
looking for ANY person or entity, but no footprints, or
sighting.
Although we assumed "big foot" or a very tall human ... I now am
convinced it was either a small demon, or an alien. It was NOT
human.
We later measured it, and the base of the window was about arm's length
taller than my father (normal height)'s head .... so it was a VERY tall
entity. it's eyes were wide, and a blend of green and red -
somewhat
"glowing" or highly reflective.
I was about 15, and now in my late 60's, I know it wasn't "normal" - as
was the "entity" when camping with Eddie Giles. I have had THREE
"alien" experiences and I was abducted in Mexico. I think God
gave
these to me because:
1) I would not "disregard" them
2) I would have the emotional strength to deal with them
3) I would vocalize them throughout life
4) I would have the memory of them. Over life, I have found that
many
(people) don't have memory retention - so many forget so much!
I also have all of this noted on my "Nephelim"
page.
People don't realize that God's creation was _vast_ , and
there were
many, many types of beings. *No* Christian wants to hear this but
I know Dr Daniel Durrich, Bob Lazar, and several
others - including Military Pilots - who have videoed encounters.
Well, they have 7 craft at S-3 (you will never hear that, or see
anything about it, but it's "Groom Lake" - about 45 minutes from "Area
51") - and Durrich was one of many biologists - that
analyzed the
cells of the beings from those craft. Although it is the
Government's
most guarded secret, I personally have no problems with beings from
other worlds ... "Angels" are, and God is, so actually Christians have
no issues either ... they just don't do any "critical thinking".
So,
we have many humanoid beings from Androgonica, and other places - and
we have Angels, Demons .... there is lots going on!
In closing, our sun - is one of the smallest stars known. The
star "UY
Scuti" is even larger than Canis Majoris ("Big Dog"). It has a radius
of 1.188 billion kilometers. Our sun is "only" 695,700 km.
Since this
star cannot be seen with the human eye, it is hard to understand why
God would create massive galaxies - trillions of light years away -
which we will never be able to see. Even at our rate of
engineering,
they figure we will be able to see some of the closer ones - in about
500 billion years. Most Christians don't think we have "that
long", so
"why bother"?
The Sun and Moon stood still:
As noted on by
other page, the "Sun stood still" verse is:
Joshua 10:13
(KJV) "And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, ... the sun stood
still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole
day."
The original Hebrew:
הַשֶּׁ֜מֶשׁ וַיִּדֹּ֨ם וְיָרֵ֣חַ עָמָ֗ד עַד־ הַשֶּׁ֙מֶשׁ֙ וַיַּעֲמֹ֤ד
בַּחֲצִ֣י הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם אָ֥ץ לָבֹ֖וא תָּמִֽים׃ כְּיֹ֥ום
Literally means: "sun to be [or grow]
dumb/silent
moon to take one's
stand as far as/up to
sun to take one's stand
half the heaven
("shah-MAH-yeem") to make
haste to come in
complete [ta·mim] day [yohm]"
So, the sun and mood didn't "stand still" - the sun grew dumb
(dim?) or became silent. The moon "took a stand" - and it states
"until the nation avenged (NOT "forgive" - TAKE VENGEANCE!!). How
many wars have been stopped in 1 day? By the way, "yohm"
means "the warm hours of a day", NOT "24 hours". So, even IF
the sun and moon stood still, it was for "the complete warm time
of the day" - usually 2 to 3 hours, depending on the season.
Bottom-line, the sun and moon DID NOT STAND STILL, and whatever DID
happen, it was NOT for 24 hours, or even a whole daylight hours.
Exodus 12:2 ("New Moon")
(KJV) "This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall
be the first month of the year to you."
הַזֶּ֛ה הַחֹ֧דֶשׁ רֹ֣אשׁ חֳדָשִׁ֑ים רִאשֹׁ֥ון לְחָדְשֵׁ֖י הַשָּׁנָֽה׃
"this/here new moon/a
month
top/beginning/leader/head new moon/a
month former/first new
moon/a month the year"
Ecclesiastes 1:9
(NIV) "there is nothing new under the sun."
(KJV) "there is no new thing under the sun.”
Original Hebrew: וְאֵ֥ין חָדָ֖שׁ תַּ֥חַתהַשָּֽׁמֶשׁ׃
Pronounced "ah’-yin khaw-dash tah’-khath haSHEH-mesh"
literally means: "nothing new/to
renew underneath/below/in place
of the sun" [ha means “the”]
The verse is preceded with:
(KJV) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that
which is done is that which shall be done”
(NIV) "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done
again"
Original Hebrew: מַה־ שֶּֽׁהָיָה֙ וּמַה־ שֶּׁנַּֽעֲשָׂ֔ה
שֶׁיֵּעָשֶׂ֑ה
Pronounced “maw haw-yaw maw asah asah"
Literally: “what/how/why to
be/become what/how/why
do/make do/make”
Those who argue - that's fine .... but you are showing extreme confirmation
bias.
See my "moon
londing
hoax" page.
Speaking of the sun and moon ...
Although I think it was a hoax - as we have precedent:
the US
Government denied the
existence of "Area 51", Aliens, and S-3 - for over 47 years. Then later
admitted [quietly] August, 2013 (Area 51) and 2021
(Aliens) the existence of both - meanintg ONE WAS A LIE.
The Moon landing: world's greatest hoax:
https://youtu.be/phPPLp9qjFA?t=300
Or search for many videos on this subject:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+moon+landing%3A+world%27s+greatest+hoax
Here is one reason I do not trust the
Government:
1) The left boot is of Neil Armstrong's actual boot. The right is
of
his footprint on the moon. As you can see, the Government either does not
have the correct boot at the Museum, or the photo of the moon is not
correct.
2) the air needed for the Astronauts to breath...
My biggest question (2023) is: Why is there still no satellite orbiting
the Moon - with a live feed of the moon? Or one from its surface
- maybe with the lunar lander in view? This could be privately
funded many times over. Instead, they (NASA) insists: "We had
the technology, but we destroyed it."
REALLY???
I may be wrong, but the math doesn't add up - no pressure suits, flimsy
craft ...
I still think it's strange - most people have to use the washroom at
least every 2 hours, and feces every day. How is all that
collected - in a mobile suit?? When I used to dive - our
tank lasted up to 1 hour - if you breathed "shallow" ... yet those 1969
Astronauts lasted 8 days** on a back pack - with an air conditioner,
and
a heater - in them??? Anyone else would need about a sea
can full of air tanks. Not to mention the Van Allen radiation
best. And all that with a TRS-80 chip - 20 years before it was
developed.
Oxygen ("O2"), but it's actually "O" (number 8) on the Periodic Chart
Those Astronauts - had enough oxygen - for 8 days** - and also with an
air conditioner - in those small back packs. I am a diver, and
when we dive, our 2 tanks last us ... breathing shallow ... for
up to
2 hours. If you breathe normally, only 1 hour. Yet the Astronauts
lasted 8 days in space - on .25 of 1 tank?? I guess they practiced
holding their breath for 36 hours at a time. And this "cardboard door"
protected Katy Perry and those bimbo girls - against 40,0000 kmh
winds. Yeah, sure. And I also met the man in the moon. We're BFFs.
**The actual mission lasted 8 days, 3 hours, 18 minutes and 35
seconds. That's from blsast-off to splashdown. The
Astranouts woud have breathed air earlier, walked down a hallway, down
the platform, and into the craft - seating, and strap-in -
- and until the hatch was opened in the ocean. Funny, they
didn't wory about any radiation from the craft!
Oxygen toxicity (poison)
Exposure to high oxygen levels, or hyperoxia, can lead to oxygen
toxicity, harming the CNS, lungs, and cells. It causes symptoms like
dizziness, shortness of breath, and tissue damage.
Breathing pure oxygen for more than 12 hours can lead to irreversible
lung damage and, eventually, death. But not if you are
an Astronaut - then it's "Ho, ho, ho, - it's Magic!!”
- - - -
Hypoxia (too LESS oxygen)
Hypoxia: low oxygen levels in the tissues
Hypoxemia: low oxygen levels in the blood
Hypoxia is often caused by hypoxemia but not always. You can be hypoxic
but not hypoxemic and vice versa.
Hypoxemic hypoxia
Low amounts of oxygen in the blood (hypoxemia) can lead to hypoxemic
hypoxia, the most common cause of hypoxia. Hypoxemia can be caused by
lung and heart diseases, congenital heart defects, and medications that
slow your breathing. Traveling to a high altitude, where levels of
oxygen are lower, can also cause hypoxemia.
Circulatory hypoxia
Your blood can have plenty of oxygen, but not enough of it gets to your
tissues if the heart doesn’t pump enough blood or there is a blockage
in a blood vessel. This is called circulatory hypoxia (also called
stagnant hypoxia or ischemic hypoxia). Congestive heart failure and
blood clots can increase your risk of circulatory hypoxia.
Anemic hypoxia
Anemic hypoxia happens when you don’t have enough red blood cells to
carry oxygen from your lungs to other tissues. You can become anemic if
your body doesn’t make enough red blood cells or it makes deformed red
blood cells.
Histotoxic hypoxia
Histotoxic hypoxia happens when your cells aren’t able to use oxygen
properly. In this case, you can have plenty of oxygen coming into your
lungs and entering your blood. But when it arrives at your tissues,
something keeps your cells from being able to use it. This can happen
with cyanide poisoning.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOTE:
How much oxygen does a person consume in a day?
The average adult, when resting, inhales and exhales about 7.5
liters of air per minute. That totals about 11,000 liters of
air per
day. A person who is exercising uses much more oxygen.
Inhaled air is about 20% oxygen. Exhaled air is
about 15% oxygen. Therefore, about 5% of pure oxygen is
consumed in each breath. That air is converted to carbon dioxide. So,
as far as how much air is actually used, human beings take in ~
550
liters of pure oxygen per day. Before I get
into the
specifics of air,
1) where were these massive air tanks stored?
2) they emphatically dictate that the cabin was sealed tight.
That's not only understandable, it's a "duuuuh!" .... so, where did the
exhaled C02 go? Either they had collection tanks (in ADDITION to
those 1,000 liter tanks - PER DAY!) or it was jettisoned (from that
"sealed" craft).
3) Where was the "rover" stored, and the many batteries it would
take for it to travel the many km it is said to have traveled?
4) You know, and I know - if the Russians had claimed all of
this, we all would be screaming "fail!!" and pointing at all of
these. Yes, it's simply confirmation
bias.
Summary: They couldn't have done this - if they took 15
semi
trucks up there!
NOTE: The ISS [claims] the CO2 is removed from the station air by an
amine scrubber, then removed from the scrubber by steam. 50% of the CO2
is converted to methane and water by a Sabatier reaction. The other 50%
of carbon dioxide is jettisoned from the ISS along with the methane
that is generated.
Space back packs
The A7L was the PSA model used on the Apollo 7 through 14 missions.
It supplied oxygen, removed carbon dioxide, pressurized and cooled the
spacesuit, and controlled humidity to provide a comfortable environment
for the astronaut. 12 of these backpacks (one for each astronaut), left
behind to conserve weight, are still on the surface of the Moon.
Lefties claim "we have ruined our planet!!", yet they have NO PROBLEMS
with us leaving junk on the Moon, and Mars, and 3 deep in the solar
system.
The average adult, when resting, inhales (and exhales) about 7.5 liters
of air per minute. That totals about 11,000 liters of air per
day. A person who is exercising uses much more oxygen. With
3 Astronauts - in that small capsule - for 4 days ... that's 33,000
liters of air alone. Then the CO2 is either jettisoned (meaning
it is NOT "air-tight"), or stored. They would have to have
400 scuba tanks - stored in that little capsule - for 1 day
alone. Actually, 1,200 total tanks for 3 days (not 4). The
weight of a tank is 30 kg, so that's 36 tons of tanks alone - and in
that cramped area. Normally, that many would take 2 football
fields.
But no American wants to believe that - it takes their "flexing
American muscle" down, and that - they _can't have_ !
But it's fun seeing all the math on-line, and the computer - even the
space shuttle - which doesn't go to the moon - requires 4 super
computers. But they went to the moon - on far less than a
TRS-80. And 500 bytes of RAM.
Back to...
Air:
The average adult male's lungs can hold a maximum of 6 liters of air,
according to the American Lung Association. This includes air from a
normal breath, plus extra air you can force in, additional air you
force out after a regular exhalation, and any air left in the lungs
after all that. The American Lung Association estimates that a typical
non-active
person consumes 7,570 liters of air per day. (this offsets the above
claim, but now we have a "range")
https://scienceoxygen.com/how-do-you-calculate-oxygen-consumption-per-patient/
"A healthy person with a good respiratory system should breathe around
16 times in a minute. This comes to approximately 23,000 breaths in one
day."
How do you calculate oxygen consumption?
Oxygen consumption = VO2 = QT x (CaO2 – CvO2)
https://www.sharecare.com/health/air-quality/oxygen-person-consume-a-day
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To give you an idea, though, a standard* aluminum 2.26 m3 (cubic meter)
(80 cubic ft) tank filled to 207 bar (3000 psi) will typically
last around 45 to 60 minutes at depths up to 10m (10 meters) (33 ft,
but
ALL diving goes by meters) for a calm diver with average breaths.
* the most common type used in recreational diving
Many moon believerss tell me "rebreathers!" - as if I neer thought of that. OK, let's add that:
A Navy Seal can stay underwater with a rebreather for up to 4 hours in
warm water, and 2 hours in cold water. So, that air tank - let's
say it lasted all day - it had more pressure in it - than the Mariana
Trench (Marianas Trench), deepest of the world's trenches. It stretches
for more than 2,540 km deep .... but it could
NOT have lasted 8+ days!
However, crank up the intensity or go deeper and your intake will
increase quite significantly.
Yes, that tank - over half the size of the Astronaut’s entire back
pack - lasts UP TO 60 minutes, but normally 45 minutes.
Do the math, and see that the moon landing was impossible.
Add to that urine, feces, water intake... Americans and the world
- have been DUPED!! Don't believe me - believe the one who staged
it all - in Los Angeles, on the sound stage - - but first ...
Part 2:
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - EXHALE:
When I dive, my exhale goes into the ocean, and rises/dissolves.
When a SEALED space suit receives exhale (CO2) where is that
collected?? If it is NOT sealed, it would leak out, and fill the
capsule with CO2 - it would kill them all in 3 hours. It their
suits ARE sealed (as they claim), then there would HAVE to be another,
LARGER receiving tank for the CO2. See where this is going?
Or, you accept that physics and chemistry DO NOT APPLY to Americans -
when in space or on the moon. We should re-name "the Moon" to "La
La Land". Put up a burger joint, a Pool - better yet, an
ocean. La La Land has it all!
STP - Standard Temperature and Pressure
STP is commonly used to define standard conditions for temperature and
pressure which is important for the measurements and documentation of
chemical and physical processes:
STP - Standard Temperature and Pressure - is defined by IUPAC
(International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) as air at 0 degrees
C and 100 pascals (1 bar).
Also named "1 Standard Atmosphere"
Stanley Kubrick moon landing hoax confession
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2022/08/01/stanley-kubrick-moon-landing-hoax-confession/
Funny videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS3blm2kjuo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep-XjUZdcRY (this is a
video to "prove we actually went", but it's a couple of "hoo-rah"
guys. So I don't want to "reward" them with a link.)
NOTE: Most all of the moon conspiracy videos - have been REMOVED from
youtube. What does THAT tell you???? Censorship by The
Left!)
Back to "serious"...
Who would know about extreme vacuum and the likelihood you could never
get a hatch to completely seal after in and out with moon dust
granulation everywhere. There's no record of any protocol
on Hatch wiping to prevent breech in extreme vacuum condition ... ???
Modern-day photos... where is the rover and flag - with that
hi-tech telescope they say is orbiting?? NASA says they are "too
busy to take it", then they said "it's too far away". I
can't wait to hear the next NASA reason - we already have them
saying: "We had the technology then, but we don't now - we
destroyed the technology.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm220Urp6SU
Yeah, *right*. Hey, anybody _else_ believe
this? Oh - I have some cheap oceanfront property to sell you in
Arizona - I’ll sell it very reasonably. Oh - cigarettes are
*good* for you! (The US government said that in the early
30's.) And science said that we will all be under water in
2016. I'm hoping 2016 doesn't come too soon - I don't want to
drowned!! I'm waiting patiently for 2016. Waiting ....
Also, a side note:
My claim in computing power is not that "we can't go now" - it means
"we couldn't have gone then" - the computing power chip was not even
the power of a burrito (chip). Figure a TRS-80 - divided by
10. Even if they had the same power is a TRS-80, they would not
have enough power. Now, *I* don't _care_ if we went, or
didn't.
My reasoning is that we did not, but my own "problem" is that
so many
_need_ to believe that we went, so they will defend that premise (to
death!). The moon landing is a religion. You'd think I was
_Satan_ for not believing we went. And by the same people who do not
think God exists. Now _there's_ irony, don't you think???
Don’t forget that NASA could never land the Eagle on earth …
yet they
landed perfectly on the moon! First try, perfection. Again,
the first prototype fails the test, yet delivers 100% on the
mission. Too bad nothing else on Earth works like that. We
should all go to the moon - so everything works the first time. The
trip to the moon takes a giant rocket. The trip off the
moon takes nothing. No build up, the module just rises up at the
same
speed and “off it goes”. This for me was the deciding factor and
I
believe we went into space but never landed on the moon.
Insulting to the Engineers and Astronauts?? You bet!! Just
as they insult Science [gender], God, human DNA and RNA - with
abortions.
And a really funny: So “high tech” that this happens at NASA:
they misplace million of dollars every year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRrNvRh166Y
Back to the Moon: In Jeffrey Kluger's book, Page 142, we read:
"In a ship like the lunar module, this apportionment of space was
especially important since the cockpit was so small - barely the size
of two phone booths - that the placement of every switch, throttle, and
storage bay had to be planned down to the fraction of an inch. Cramped
as the ship was when the astronauts were floating about in it in
shirtsleeves, it was even more so when they were dressed in the
balloon like suits and laboring under the suitcase-like backpacks they
would have to wear on the lunar surface." In order to leave this tiny
ship, the astronauts would have to open the hatch in the forward
portion of the bulkhead and then, one at a time, get down on their
hands and knees and back out onto the porch-like platform that led to
the descent ladder...As soon as the door was opened and swung inward,
the junior pilot would thus be backed against the right wall of the
cockpit until the commander had maneuvered his entire body out of the
ship and shut the hatch behind him. At this point, the copilot would
waddle to the left, open the hatch back up, and follow his commander
down...Armstrong would be the one flattened against the wall..."
Getting back into the LEM after a moonwalk would be even more
difficult. The first astronaut inside would have to squeeze past the
32" door in order to get behind it sufficiently to close it again. This
astronaut would then assume a 'flattened' position - pressed against
the wall to allow enough room for the second astronaut to enter. Then
he too would have to squeeze behind the hatch door in order to close
and seal it before re-pressurizing the cabin.
And then the two astronauts would have to undress and deal with their
diapers and urine bag. All this activity would take place in a space
equal to two telephone booths and with no chair to sit on. This routine
would have been repeated three times by astronauts John Young and
Charles Duke (Apollo 16), and Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt (Apollo
17), who made three EVA's (moonwalks) during their missions.
A great deal of bending down and turning around - with, and without,
the PLSS backpacks attached - will be required before they can
de-pressurize the cabin, bend down to open the hatch door, sidestep the
large inward-swinging door, turn around, drop to their knees, and exit
backwards through the hatch. One astronaut will be pinned between the
hatch door and the cabin wall on the right while the first astronaut
performs his egress maneuver.
Simply attaching a helmet to the astronaut will involve bending over to
pick up the helmet, raising one's arms and elbows, and lowering the
head - tasks for which there seems to be insufficient clearance. Then
he would have to bend down again to pick up his gloves. No photographs
appear to exist of both astronauts, fully-suited inside the LM
simulator with helmet, gloves and PLSS backpack attached - all ready to
open the hatch door. Perhaps that's because it was virtually impossible
for the astronauts to get dressed, leave and re-enter, and to get
undressed within the limited space and clearances available inside the
LM.
Would you travel 240,000 miles into the vacuum of space,
through
hazardous radiation belts, and use this cramped spacecraft sheathed
with aluminum about the thickness of 2 or 3 layers of aluminum foil -
to
go for a walk on the Moon? Therefore, were the Apollo manned moon
landings fact or fiction? You be the judge!
Next, we're gonna have a manned mission to the sun - but don't worry,
we'll go at night!
- - - - -
America never went to the moon. Just imagine a small magic battery,
inside a back pack, can run a heating condenser system, cooling
condenser system, water pumps, radio, telephone, lighting equipment. A
very small oxygen tank that lasted 71 hours, a suite that can withstand
260 degrees C (hotter than an oven!) And not using the rest room
for six days. The tin can did not even have a decompression chamber.
That magic battery doesn't exist 50 years later, a battery that
size can't even run a flash light for 4 hours.
- - - - -
The radiation level on the moon are 1369 msv, above the level where
humans shows radiation poison symptoms within a short time, and they
were there 21.5 hours?? Also, how were they not even slightly affected
by the solar winds?
If we can get to the moon with 60’s technology, 50 years later it
should be incredibly easy!
If something doesn’t make sense it usually isn’t true.
Radiation sickness occurs when you have been exposed to around 200 to
1000 'rads' of radiation within a few hours.
They claim they brought back rocks from the moon's surface. "They
returned with more than 382kg (842 pounds) of Moon rocks, which have
been shared and studied by scientists in many countries for
decades." Why so many - why not just 3 or 4? And that
is VERY heavy - the average bodybuilder weighs 100 kg, so they brought
back 4 huge guys of weight.
- - - - -
One aspect that really bugs me when it comes to the discussion of
whether of not moon landing is a true story, is the attitude of the
people in the scientific community, which does definitely not, I dare
say, dovetail with the incredible act they claim to have achieved: no
exclamation marks or hot discussions or debates about doing it again;
no hot discussions about developing space technology to go up there
again, or to any other space satellite or planet for that matter. No,
the pattern of the attitude seems to me to be the following: One great
step for mankind... then complete silence.
Had they really achieved what they claimed to have aspired to do, i.e.
the moon landing, we would have heard more about that achievement. And,
indeed, we would have heard A LOT MORE about future prospects of doing
it again and again and again.
- - - - -
Actually the moon is not very reflective at all. Lunar albedo is
just
8-11%, which is not much. And light is scattered very little as there
is no air and particles suspended in air that could refract the light.
Incidentally in this video
they actually show how these lit up astronaut
photos were done- by reflectors put behind the camera
and opposite the light source.
- - - - -
They say we went to the Moon, "SIX TIMES in a 2.5 year period",
brought a [heavy] electric dune buggy, drove it on the moon, hit some
golf balls!
So, we polluted the moon? Or we never went?
One thing I have learned: never wrestle with a pig, you only get
muddy, and the pig likes it.
The "Flat Earth" Theories:
The “flat earth” new argument and “support”:
Job 38:14 - - in the original Hebrew:
תִּ֭תְהַפֵּךְ כְּחֹ֣מֶר חֹותָ֑ם וְ֝יִֽתְיַצְּב֗וּ כְּמֹ֣ו לְבֽוּשׁ׃
This means: "to turn or overturn
morter/clay/cement a seal
or signet ring to set on/take a stand
like/as
clothing/wardrobe"
Yeah, I guess that proves "the earth is flat": "Overturn morter a seal
take a stand like wardrobe”.
:-)
Don't worry - I believe the earth is round, but I was GOING to use this
as "proof" of a flat earth (ha ha). According to King James, the Earth
IS flat, but he mistranslated it in the first place: - here's one that
supports a FLAT earth (if you believe the ghastly KJV): Matthew 28:20:
(KJV) "Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.
Amen."
διδάσκοντες τηρεῖν πάντα ἐνετειλάμην ἰδοὺ εἰμι πάσας ἕως συντελείας
αἰῶνος
Literally means: "to teach to watch
over/guard all/every to
enjoin/to charge look I
exist/I am all/every
until a joint
payment/completion a space of time/an age"
So, it was NOT "end of the world" - it is "end of time", and "Amen" was
not in the original. "to observe" is actually "to watch
over/guard". And WHO translated it to "alway'?? That's not
even a word!!
Additional "support" for the "flat earth" platform:
2 Peter 3:5
"the Earth was formed out of water"
The original Greek: γῆ συνεστῶσα ὕδατος ὕδατος
Literally and correctly translates directly to:
"earth/land to establish/stand
near/consist water water"
1 Samuel 2:8 - which, by the way, is technically "One Kings". Two
Samual is technically Two Kings, One Kings is technically Three Kings,
and Two Kings is technically Four Kings".
"the Earth rests on pillars"
The original Hebrew: מְצֻ֣קֵי אֶ֔רֶץ לַֽיהוָה֙
וַיָּ֥שֶׁת תֵּבֵֽל׃
Literally and correctly translates directly to: "molten
support/something narrow - a column or hilltop or
pillar
earth/land Yahweh to
put/set world"
1 Chronicles 16:30
"the earth does not move, but stands still"
The original Hebrew: תֵּבֵ֖ל תִּכֹּ֥ון תִּמֹּֽוט׃
Yes, 3 words!
Literally and correctly translates directly to:
"world to be firm to totter/shake"
So, the translators *added* the "not".
Job 37:3 - which was previously part of the Apocrypha - as were
Revelation, Psalms, Provers, and James)
"the Earth has ends and edges"
The original Hebrew: כַּנְפֹ֥ות הָאָֽרֶץ׃
Literally and correctly translates directly to:
"wing/extremity/bird/border/corner/end/feather
earth/land"
Isaiah 11:12
"the earth has four corners"
The original Hebrew: מֵאַרְבַּ֖ע כַּנְפֹ֥ות הָאָֽרֶץ׃
Literally and correctly translates directly to: "4
wing/extremity/bird/border/corner/end/feather
earth/land
Revelation 7:1 - originally and properly called "Apoclypse of Yohannes"
The original Greek: τέσσαρας ἀγγέλους ἑστῶτας τέσσαρας
γωνίας γῆς
Literally and correctly translates directly to: "4
messengers
("angels") to make to stand
4 an angle/a corner the
earth/land to be strong/rule"
For some reason, "Christians" trust those 1611 AD Translators - who
were not familiar with Koine Greek - to supersede our tens of thousands
of PhDs today, with AI.
The view that the Earth is fixed, immovable and non-rotating (Joshua
10:12;
1 Chronicles 16:30; Psalm 93:1; Psalm 96:10; Psalm 104:5)
In Daniel 4:10-11, Daniel 'saw a tree of great height at the centre of
the
Earth, reaching with its top to the sky, and visible on the Earth's
farthest bounds'. This would only be possible if the Earth was
flat. In
the New Testament (Matthew 6:13), Satan took Jesus to the top of a
mountain
from where they could see all the kingdoms on Earth.
No, the Bible does not teach that the earth is flat.
The Bible is not a science textbook. At the same time, nothing in the
Bible contradicts proved science. What the Bible says is “always
reliable, now and forever.”
—Psalm 111:8.
- - - -
When it comes to scientific claims, the Bible has the dumbest claims,
with all due respect to Jews and Christians. The Bible claims that
Earth has four ends and four corners. Nobody can ever think a ball or a
cycle to have corners and ends! Only flat items can have corners and
ends, and this is exactly what the bible is trying to express regarding
the shape of the earth. The earth is not flat, as once thought and it
has no corners or ends at all. If Magnetic Poles can be taken as ends
or corners of earth, then this definitely opposed to the axis of
rotation.
Isaiah 11:12
And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble
the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from
the FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH. (KJV)
Revelation 7:1
1And after these things I saw four angels standing on FOUR CORNERS OF
THE EARTH, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should
not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. (KJV)
Job 38:13
That it might take hold of the ENDS OF THE EARTH, that the wicked
might be shaken out of it? (KJV)
Jeremiah 16:19
O LORD, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of
affliction, the Gentiles shall come unto thee from the ENDS OF THE
EARTH, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity,
and things wherein there is no profit. (KJV)
Daniel 4:11
The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto
heaven, and the sight thereof to the ENDS OF ALL THE EARTH: (KJV)
Matthew 4:8
Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and
sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; (KJV)
Astronomical bodies are spherical, and you cannot see the entire
exterior surface from any place. The kingdoms of Egypt, China, Greece,
Crete, sections of Asia Minor, India, Maya (in Mexico), Carthage (North
Africa), Rome (Italy), Korea, and other settlements from these kingdoms
of the world were widely distributed.
The flat Earth is established and can never move?! The Sun hurries back
to where it rises?!
The Psalm 104:5 and Ecclesiastes 1:5 verses from the Bible in this
section were sent to me by Abdullah Bisyir; may Allah Almighty always
be pleased with him.
"He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved. (From the
NIV Bible, Psalm 104:5)"
"The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty
and is armed with strength. The world [The deceiving translators
should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly established; it cannot
be moved. (From the NIV Bible, Psalm 93:1)"
"Say among the nations, "The LORD reigns." The world [Again, the
deceiving translators should've said "earth", not "world"] is firmly
established, it cannot be moved; he will judge the peoples with equity.
(From the NIV Bible, Psalm 96:10)"
"The sun rises and the sun sets, and hurries back to where it rises.
(From the NIV Bible, Ecclesiastes 1:5)"
Well, I don't think there is any need for much explanation to the
nonsense above! It is crystal clear that the Bible is full of man-made
corruptions and alterations. Since when the Earth is flat and can never
move?! We all know that the Earth and the other planets rotate and move
in space around the Sun. Since when the Sun hurries back to where it
rises, like if there is some hole it rises from and another hole it
sets through on Earth?!
For those Jews and Christians who would like to see where in the Noble
Quran does Allah Almighty say that the planets in space rotate and
move, read the following Noble Verse:
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon,
all (the celestial bodies) swim along, each in its orbit with its own
motion. (The Noble Quran, 21:33)"
For more information and other Noble Verses, please visit:
Science in the Quran and Islam.
The Earth is round according to Islam.
The Earth has pillars?!
"He shakes the earth from its place and makes its pillars tremble.
(From the NIV Bible, Job 9:6)"
"Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you
understand. (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:4)"
The Earth has Edges?!
"that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of
it? (From the NIV Bible, Job 38:13)"
"He unleashes his lightning beneath the whole heaven and sends it to
the ends of the earth. (From the NIV Bible, Job 37:3)"
"for he views the ends of the earth and sees everything under the
heavens. (From the NIV Bible, Job 28:24)"
"Their measure is longer than the earth and wider than the sea. (From
the NIV Bible, Job 11:9)"
Does Isaiah 40:22 really say that Earth is Round?
It is quite clear that the above Biblical Verses suggest and claim that
the Earth is flat, has Edges, has Four Corners, has Pillars, and has
Foundations. No unbiased person would deny the straight forward quotes
above. Only the desperate biased Jews and Christians would.
Some desperate Christians have gone as far as presenting Isaiah 40:22
to try to prove that the Bible claims that the earth is round.
Let us look at what the Verse states:
"He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are
like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and
spreads them out like a tent to live in. (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah
40:22)"
First of all, a circle is not a ball or sphere or an egg-shaped object.
A circle is a flat round surface, similar to flat rectangular, or
square, or triangular surfaces. So if the Bible claims that the Earth
is a circle, then this is still bogus because the earth is obviously
not a flat surface.
We have 2 conditions here:
1- Isaiah 40:22 is claiming that the Earth is a flat circle.
2- Isaiah 40:22 is claiming that the Earth has a circle above it.
If we were to take condition #1, then we are left with a clear and
irrefutable contradiction between Isaiah 40:22 and some of the Bible's
verses that I mentioned above in the article, because a flat circle
doesn't have "four corners", and ironically in either case, we still
have a scientifically false claim about the Earth's shape.
If we were to take condition #2, then it doesn't prove that the Earth
is an egg-shaped figure, and Isaiah 40:22 surely becomes irrelevant to
this subject.
One
thing is for sure clear, and that is Isaiah 40:22 is obviously
ambiguous and not clear if we wish to prove from it that the Earth is
not flat and is egg-shaped. If we look at what the entire Bible says
(as presented above by all the Verses) about the shape of the Earth as
the Roman Catholic Church did in the past, then we would reach the same
conclusion they reached, and that is: The Earth is Flat!
Certainly, when Christopher Columbus thought that he could reach India
by going west in the Atlantic ocean instead of east as it was
traditionally done, the Church in Europe was afraid that he will
eventually reach the "end of the earth" and the "Edges of the earth" as
the Bible clearly says above, and fall off into the space and die.
On my personal note: This frustrates me no no end: there is NO
"HE" in
the Hebrew, and the word for "circle" is ח֣וּג
pronounced "khoog",
and it means "vault/horizon/compass/circle/circuit".
The rebuttal:
What does the Bible mean by “the four corners of the earth”?
The expressions “the four corners of the earth” and “the ends of the
earth” used in the Bible are not to be taken literally, as if the earth
were square or had ends. (Isaiah 11:12; Job 37:3) Instead, these
evidently are figures of speech referring to the entire surface of the
earth. The Bible uses the four points of the compass in a similar
way.—Luke 13:29.
The Hebrew term translated “corners” or “ends” seems to be an idiom
based on the word for “wings.” According to The International Standard
Bible Encyclopedia, “because the wing of a bird is used as a covering
for its young, [this Hebrew term] acquires the meaning of the extremity
of anything stretched out.” The same reference work adds that at Job
37:3 and Isaiah 11:12, “the term means the coasts, boundaries, or
extremities of the land surface of the earth.”
What about the Devil’s temptation of Jesus?
To tempt Jesus, “the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain
and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.” (Matthew
4:8) Some claim that this Bible account teaches that the entire world
is visible from a single spot on a flat earth. However, the “unusually
high mountain” in this account seems to be a metaphor and not a
physical location. Consider why this conclusion is reasonable.
There is no literal mountain on earth from which all the kingdoms of
the world are visible.
The Devil showed Jesus not only all the kingdoms but also “their
glory.” Such details could not be seen from a great distance, so it
seems that the Devil used some sort of vision to show these to Jesus.
This could be similar to the way a person uses a projector and a screen
to show someone pictures of various places on earth.
The parallel account at Luke 4:5 says that the Devil showed Jesus “all
the kingdoms of the inhabited earth in an instant of time,” which would
not be possible through normal human vision. This implies that the
Devil presented this temptation to Jesus through some means other than
literal human sight.
Star sizes
https://youtu.be/PF__UZx_GHA
Well, that's the biggest star that _we have found_ . Stephenson 2 DFK 1
- discovered in 1990 - is 19,000 light-years away from Earth. So it
took light _19,000 years_ to reach us. Explain that - if the universe
is only 5,000 years old. Hint: "And the
earth was without form, and
void" - how long was it without form, and void??
 Our
sun’s diameter is 1,392,680 km
(Earth is 12,742 km
The crust is 35km think
The mantle is up to 3,000 km
The core is 4,600 km thick - the width of the USA
it is the core's spinning that generates gravity.)
KY Cygni
Diameter: 2,877,276,880 km (2.8 billion km)
Canis Majoris
Diameter: 4 billion km
Stevenson 2-18
Diameter: 5,988,524,000 km (nearly 6 billion)
If you were in a commercial jet (500 km/h) - flying on the surface, it
would take your entire lifetime, and several of your friend's lifetimes
- to fly once around this star.
https://youtu.be/ZBfIrZ3C0vo
For size comparison, the radius of the Earth is 6,378 km. The
diameter of the Earth is 12,756 kilometers. We weren't aware that
we are THAT high above an endless abyss! That's higher than being
In SPACE!
The largest stars currently known:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_stars
RSGC1-F01
VY Canis Majoris
AH Scorpii
RSGC1-F06
S Persei
VX Sagittarii
NML Cygni
 Stephenson 2 DFK
2 (19,000 - 98,000 light-years away)
Stephenson 2 DFK 49
- - - - - -
Stephenson 2-18 (St2-18) (18,900 light years from Earth)
also known as RSGC2-18 and Stephenson 2 DFK 1
- - - - - -
HD 143183 (V558 Normae)
PZ Cassiopeiae
μ Cephei
RSGC1-F10
V354 Cephei
Westerlund 1 W237
ST Cephei
IRC -10414
RSGC1-F05
V517 Monocerotis
GCIRS 7
Westerlund 1 W26
EV Carinae
[A72c] 16
WY Velorum A
RSGC1-F02
V582 Cassiopeiae
RW Cygni
RW Cephei
RSGC1-F08
RT Carinae
RSGC1-F04
UU Persei
LL Pegasi
HD 126577
V766 Centauri Aa
HaroChavira 1
CM Velorum
AG Camelopardalis
SU Persei
SW Cephei
KY Cygni
BC Cygni
MY Cephei
V346 Puppis
V530 Cassiopeiae
V602 Carinae
VV Cephei A
U Lacertae A
KW Sagittarii
Ve 4-64
V349 Carinae
RSGC1-F07
RSGC1-F09
RSGC1-F11
RSGC1-F13
V674 Cephei
CZ Hydrae
Some more interesting facts:
1) There are over a 100 million black holes in the Milky Way galaxy
alone
https://youtu.be/H61og1uA-n0
2) There's a pulsar (a type of neutron star) that spins 716 times a
second
3) It would take a modern spacecraft (traveling 60,000 km/h (40,000
mph) 450 million years just to get to the center of our own galaxy
https://youtu.be/_oZB4Ka-oYU
4) It rains diamonds on Jupiter and Saturn
https://youtu.be/niw_n34lcAI
5) There's a planet made of diamonds that's twice the size of the earth
https://youtu.be/WN8jCbT18JQ
Plasma:
State #4 of matter (4th state of matter / Fourth state of matter)
From the Greek word πλάσμα (pronounced "plásma")
A state of matter that results from a gaseous state having undergone
some degree of ionization. It thus consists of a significant portion of
charged particles (ions and/or electrons).
Pi, "pie", and π
π =
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286...
Correctly called "pee", not "pie" - this Greek
letter = our "p".
Ever our galaxy is nowhere near the center of the universe .... we are on one of the "arms" - of 2 main arms called Scutum-Centaurus and Perseus. It also features a dense region known as the central bar. Our solar system lies on a more modest structure called the Orion spur.
Earth orbits the sun at a distance of 149.6 million kilometres and we are in the Orion arm,
around 26,500 light years from the centre. Yes, it would take you
26,500 years - travelling at 300,000 km/second - to reach the center,
and that's just our galaxy.
Dwarf Planets
The International Astronomical Union officially recognizes 5 dwarf
planets in the solar system: Pluto, the most commonly known, along with
Ceres, Makemake, Haumea, and Eris. Except for Ceres, which
inhabits the main Asteroid Belt, all the dwarf planets mentioned above
are located within the Kuiper Belt. The belt stretches from around 30
AU, just beyond Neptune’s orbit, to 50 AU from the Sun, and is about 20
times as wide and up to 200 times as massive as the asteroid belt
farther inside the solar system.
The Heliosphere
The next landmark within the solar system is the heliosphere, the
region in which the Sun’s effects can be felt. The Sun constantly emits
charged particles, also known as solar winds. The heliosphere forms a
shell around the solar system, stretching 123 AU, until reaching the
“termination shock.” It is at this point where the motion of solar wind
particles is significantly slowed due to the outside pressure of the
interstellar medium (ISM). Further out lies the heliosheath, the region
between the termination shock and the heliopause. The heliopause is
considered one of the outermost edges of the solar system. After
passing the boundary of the heliopause, it is considered deep space,
commonly referred to as the ISM. Once crossing this boundary, the
effects from the Sun can no longer be felt, as the strength of the
interstellar medium outweighs that of the solar wind particles.
While some consider the heliopause to be the edge of the solar system,
there is one more boundary beyond it. Last lies the Oort Cloud, marking
the true outermost edge of the Solar System. While the trajectory of
the planets, moons, asteroids, dwarf planets, and KBOs follow similar
flat disk orbitals around the Sun, it is believed that the Oort Cloud
is a giant spherical bubble surrounding the entire solar system.
It’s estimated that the inner edge of the Oort Cloud is between 2,000
and 5,000 AU from the Sun, while the outer edge is predicted to be
between 10,000 and 100,000 AU from the Sun — 100,000 AU is
approximately 1.5 light years. For some perspective of these vast
distances, NASA’s Voyager 1 travels at around 1 million miles per day.
The spacecraft will not reach the inner edge of the Oort Cloud for
another 300 years and the outer edge for approximately 30,000 years,
according to NASA.
The Oort Cloud is composed of billions and speculated even
trillions of pieces of space debris. A disturbance to the orbit of one
of the icy bodies within the Oort Cloud can knock it out of its normal
trajectory and trigger a long fall toward our Sun. A recent example of
this is C/2013 A1 Siding Spring, which passed by Mars in 2014 and
survived potential disintegration by the Sun. However, it will not
return to our solar system for about 740,000 years.
While scientists have not directly observed one of the icy worlds
within the Oort Cloud, its existence is widely accepted within the
scientific community, as it fits with observations of long-period
comets in the planetary region of the solar system and provides an
explanation for these comets’ origins.
 
I have mixed feeling about the space junk we have sent to
Mars (and into the solar system), but for those people who hate "that
we have destroyed our planet!", it is completely hypocritical
if anyone
with said mind set - supports any mission or space probe to Mars or
anywhere else. We have seen what "junk" has done to Mt
Everest! (it's a dump - literally!! Spent oxygen
tanks everywhere on top!)
Besides, Mars is VERY hot on the sun side, and VERY cold on the shade
side. Those who want to go (it's a one-way trip - for life!),
then first - live in Alert, NU - for at least 2 years. It's -80
there .... MUCH warmer than Mars. If you love Alert, then
consider going to a MUCH colder place.
If we colonize other planets, who’s to say we won’t ruin those - like
we have ruined this, Mt Everest, and much more? Humans have
consistently proven our inability to preserve ecosystem due to greed or
lack of care for natural resources. Our obsession with advancing human
society has caused extinction of whole animal species, glaciers to
melt, and trees to die. If we colonize other planets in hopes to
advance society, we run the risk of destroying a whole new
planet. Furthermore, sending humans to colonize other planets
will cost billions of dollars. This money could be used to feed the
hungry, provide shelter for the homeless or even advance medicine. Why
spend money on space when there are problems to be solved here on Earth.
NOTE:
As I stated in my "abortion"
section, I also find it hilarious - if anyone says a fetus is NOT life,
yet a singe cell on Mars would be. Although (as stated
above) I have seen a UFO, I do believe God created other life - not
just The (invisible) Angels and us, in this vast universe.
As Forrest Gump would say: "That's all I have to say about that."
The Kola Superdeep Borehole, drilled by the Soviet Union from 1970
to 1989 on Russia's Kola Peninsula near the Norwegian border, remains
the deepest artificial hole ever created on Earth. Reaching a vertical
depth of 12,262 meters (40,230 feet, or about 7.6 miles), this narrow
23-centimeter (9-inch) borehole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZNwsMnliJo
One commenter writes:
I was a drilling engineer at Exxon , we drilled a 25,000 foot well near
Enid Oklahoma into the Morrow formation, the bottom hole temperature
was 500 degrees, and the bottom hole pressure was 15,000 psi, it flowed
several million cf of gas per day
Annother commenter writes:
Very interesting with a few errors. The first hole was not abandoned
because the drill string broke, but why it broke. Drill strings used to
break with some frequency and there were methods of retrieving the
broken string developed as far back as the 1930's. It broke because the
Russians did not have the drilling fluid technology to prevent the hole
from collapsing in on itself, after the collapse they obtained
contracts from 3 Western companies to assist them with the project.
Dresser Industries, Baroid Industries, and Schlumberger. The first two
were experts in drilling fluids and provided the materials to have
dense enough and thermally stable enough drilling fluids to contain the
pressures and keep the hole from collapsing, while not turning into
vapor. The third provided drilling while measuring instrumentation that
allowed them to monitor conditions of the rocks as they drilled, to ad
to the cuttings arriving at the surface. As a petroleum geologist I
followed this as well as the corresponding Mohole project in the west.
For fun:
The shortest commercial flight in the world: 53 seconds...
Flights run daily on this unusual route, with the total distance being
just 2.7km (1.7 mi), and 53 seconds. It's mainly used by teachers
and students heading to study archaeological sites, but health
professionals also use the route to tend to residents. The
world’s shortest commercial flight takes place between the two Orkney
Islands, Westray and Papa Westray, just north of Scotland. about
30 percent of the service's passengers are associated with the Orkney
Islands Council's education service, while many others are health staff
and patients of the Scottish National Health Service. The island of
Papa Westray is home to just over 70 people, and 60 archaeological
sites.
 
The distance is pretty short, there is only one other option for
residents of Papa Westray wanting to travel to the slightly larger
island of Westray, the ferry, which takes roughly 25 minutes.
There are no bridges connecting the islands, and quite simply, the
population of Papa Westray is too small for the construction of a
bridge to make financial sense.
The pilot of Westray's tiny flight noted that he'd flown this route
around 5,000 times but has only racked up a total of about 50 hours of
flight time.
https://youtu.be/fwyVWaCAD2A?t=10
The world's longest passenger flight takes you from New York's JFK to
Singapore Changi Airport in 19 hours.
Women in Space
And I hate to post this, but...
If it WAS real, Katy Perry regrets "making a public spectacle" of going
to space. At age 40, she was one of 6 women to fly in the Blue
Origin NS-31 from Texas on Monday in a "mission" funded by Amazon
billionaire Jeff Bezo's space exploration company. The 11-minute
journey has been criticized for its questionable environmental impact,
and for the bizarre and dramatic antics of the crew, including Perry.
The lucky celebrity astronauts are already well aware of criticism
aimed against them. The spacegoers hosted a press conference after the
flight - and in many cases only made critics angrier with their righteous
justification of the trip.
For ME, I think it would take more than 11 minutes to reach space, and
come back down - especially since it took NASA 2 days to get
replacement Astronauts to the ISS. And 2 more days back.
Yet Perry and "oh, TOTALLY!!" [they took God's name in vain several
times: OM...] crew made it in 11 minutes - and the flimsy door -
could withstand the 22,000 kmh of wind??
What the very top of "Mount
Stupid" looks like - Blue Origin’s “Astronauts” with Katy Perry:
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with
limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities.
It was first described by the psychologists David Dunning and Justin
Kruger in 1999. People with limited competence overestimate their
abilities. The least competent often incorrectly rate themselves as
high-performers because they do not know otherwise.
https://youtu.be/eNJxALUUKhQ
Women in space
https://youtu.be/Fxz1AVK-jmk
Before we get to the "Katy Perry" jokes,
There was a Female Astronaut that just returned after being trapped for
a YEAR and the Media IGNORED HER.
A REAL woman astronaut is RUSSIAN: (the People we are programmed
to HATE now)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_space
The first woman to fly in space was Soviet Valentina Tereshkova, aboard
the Vostok 6 space capsule on June 16–19, 1963. Tereshkova was a
textile-factory assembly worker, rather than a pilot like the male
cosmonauts flying at the time, chosen for propaganda value, her
devotion to the Communist Party, and her years of experience in sport
parachuting, which she used on landing after ejecting from her capsule.
https://www.spaceflighthistories.com/post/forgotten-soviet-female-cosmonauts
On June 16, 1963, Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova made history as
the first woman to fly in space. No woman would fly in space again
until 1982 with the flight of Svetlana Savitskaya on Soyuz T-7.
https://russianlife.com/the-russia-file/russian-ladies-in-space/
Colonel-Engineer Valentina Vladimirovna Tereshkova
Call Sign: Chayka (Seagull)
Born March 6, 1937 (now age 88 [2025])
A fascination with parachute jumping led Valentina Tereshkova the
unlikely, history making role as the first woman in space. Unlikely
because Valentina, unlike other cosmonauts, had never been a test
pilot. For Valentina, parachute jumping was a hobby. She made her first
jump in 1959, at age 22, as part of the Aviation Club from Yaroslavl.
At the time, she was working at the local textile mill and formed a
workers parachute club there. In 1961, Valentina became the secretary
of the local Young Communist League and joined the Communist Party in
1962.
She is still living today.
- - - - -
On to THE JOKES...
Then "Menopause One" launches for 10 minutes and they are celebrated as
heroes. The “accomplishment” is that they proved Botox and silicone
won’t explode at that altitude!
Not even the silence of space could stop these women from
talking. At least 6 men got to be in peace and think in silence
for 11 minutes….
No Katie dear It's not " historical" It's hysterical.
They are not astronauts... They are rich women who got bored of yachts.
She kissed the ground like she was a Vietnam POW who just returned to
the states for the first time -
but I think she got it confused with her “I kissed a girl…."
They weren’t crew. They were cargo. Imagine if they got stuck in space,
they would be saying " we are not astronauts, we don't know what to do
- help!!!”
Gayle says: "have any of you gone to space?” - like she's a pro now and
us little people are so unimportant.
Literally more coverage of this than the real astronauts who just
returned from 9 months in space
The "space suits" for these women were cosmetic. Shepard’s space suit
was to keep him alive. The difference in risk is, pardon the pun,
astronomical.
Astronauts didn't orbit as real astronauts must orbit ONCE to be
astronauts. Russian woman in 1960s orbited 48 times ALONE.
Anyone who has taken a video with their cell phone is now a Hollywood
Director.
Everyone who watched this video is now a Film Director.
"Is Math related to Science ?”
- “Astronaut" Katy Perry (2017)
I've mixed oil with gasoline for my 2 stroke chainsaw and trimmed my
trees , I am now a petroleum engineer and a lumber jack.
I fell over, now I'm a stuntman. I also cut my grass, I'm now a farmer.
I thought about which breakfast cereal to eat, I must be a philosopher.
I just rode my bike to 7-Eleven. I think I’m ready for the Tour de
France.
All my kids rode the little fiberglass airplanes that go round and
round at the carnival. A whole family of aviators!
The dumbest comment I heard from these “astronauts” was Gayle saying
she always held onto something so she wouldn’t float upside down
because she didn’t want blood to rush to her head. Think about that for
half a second.
I took a ride in back of a police car that means I'm a policeman
Built by men, financed by men, driven by men. What an amazing
accomplishment by women. The lesson they gave to women was finding a
man who could pay for you to go to space.
Last few years, they couldn't define a “woman". Now they're spouting
"women", but now don't know the definition of "astronaut”.
If going into space for 3 minutes make you an astronaut, then I'm a
gynecologist.
Their egos and narcissism also explain why they're convinced we'll
listen to them when they tell us who to vote for. They have the
maturity of 13 year old girls.
The fact they spent more time looking into the camera than looking out
the window to see earth just screams peak celebrity narcissism.
We should punish Blue Origin - because they failed to leave Katy Perry
up there!
1960s = The Right Stuff
2025 = Flight of the Bimbos
At least they tried to send the trash into space. But it fell back down.
I microwave leftovers, according to this logic, I’m a 5-star chef.
I am an accountant - because I log into my banking app.
This ride had enormous scientific value: If you send a few stupid women
up to the Kármán line, they'll come back even stupider.
I recently put a bandaid on a cut; now I’m officially a surgeon.
I checked the oil level on my truck today. I am now a master mechanic.
I looked at the moon once through a telescope. I am now an
Astrophysicist.
I just took a one hour flight in coach from DC to NYC. Thanks to Gayle
King, I now understand that my flight made me both a pilot and an
inspiration. I hope that somewhere a child sees what I achieved and
thinks, "I too can be somebody!"
So let me get this straight…they want to be congratulated for taking
what is essentially a Space Uber?
I flew to Hawaii Now I'm officially a Hawaiian
Have you been to Hawaii? Have you?
I found out about this by seeing a headline that said "Kattie Perry
comes back down to earth" and the first thing that came to my mind was
"wow, good for her, she is back on her meds”
They rode a phallic shaped rocket to the climax of it's reach and then
screamed incoherently.
One small step for rich narcissistic women, one giant leap backwards
for womankind.
The most ridiculous part of this whole fiasco is this is being branded
as groundbreaking and empowering woman who want to be astronauts,
meanwhile Navy Captain Sunita Williams just got home from being in
space for 9 months. The toll that took on her body, everything she
sacrificed and where is all this same celebration for her? A few low
level news broadcasts for a day or two.
Katy proves that being an airhead you can float almost all the way to
outer space.
Plank Theory / Planck Theory:
At one extreme is something called Planck
temperature, and is equivalent to 1.417 x 10(32) degrees Kelvin
(141 million million million million million degrees). This is what
people will often refer to as the "absolute hot". Nothing in today's
Universe comes close to these kinds of temperatures, but it did exist
for a brief moment right at the dawn of time. In that fraction of a
second – a single unit of Planck time, in fact – when the size of the
Universe was just one Planck length across, the random movement of its
contents was about as extreme as it could get.
NOTE: a "plank" is a billion billion times smaller than an atom. Even
compared to a proton, one of the tiniest particles inside an atom, the
Planck Length is still much smaller.
c, G, ħ, and kB
1.416×1032 Kelvin
For
fun: the temperature and pressure inside the engine's combustion
chamber is very high -- roughly 3400ş C and 100 atmospheres (100 Bar)
for the Falcon Heavy's Merlin engines.
Weak force
The weak force, or weak interaction, is stronger than gravity, but it
is only effective at very short distances. It acts on the subatomic
level and plays a crucial role in powering stars and creating elements.
It is also responsible for much of the natural radiation present in the
universe, according to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator
Facility (Jefferson Lab).
Italian physicist Enrico Fermi devised a theory in 1933 to explain beta
decay, which is the process by which a neutron in a nucleus changes
into a proton and expels an electron, often called a beta particle in
this context. "“He defined a new type of force, the so-called weak
interaction, that was responsible for decay, and whose fundamental
process was transforming a neutron into a proton, an electron and a
neutrino," which was later determined to be an anti-neutrino, wrote
Giulio Maltese, an Italian physics historian, in "Particles of Man," an
article published in 2013 in the journal Lettera Matematica.
Strong force
That which binds quarks to protons, neutrons - and each to each other.
Definitions:
Weak force
The weak force, or weak interaction, is stronger than gravity, but it
is only effective at very short distances. It acts on the subatomic
level and plays a crucial role in powering stars and creating elements.
It is also responsible for much of the natural radiation present in the
universe, according to the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator
Facility (Jefferson Lab).
Italian physicist Enrico Fermi devised a theory in 1933 to explain beta
decay, which is the process by which a neutron in a nucleus changes
into a proton and expels an electron, often called a beta particle in
this context. "“He defined a new type of force, the so-called weak
interaction, that was responsible for decay, and whose fundamental
process was transforming a neutron into a proton, an electron and a
neutrino," which was later determined to be an anti-neutrino, wrote
Giulio Maltese, an Italian physics historian, in "Particles of Man," an
article published in 2013 in the journal Lettera Matematica.
Strong force
That which binds quarks to protons, neutrons - and each to each other.
Mental Health,
Disorders, Syndromes:
The Dunning-Kruger Effect
When people claim they know the “easy answer”, yet don’t even know it -
it’s usually a “challenge” they give to another person - to make
themselves feel superior, yet they themselves don’t know the answer.
Anosognosia:
Anosognosia is a disorder that keeps you from recognizing other
conditions you have. It commonly happens with conditions like
schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease.
Impostor syndrome
A psychological pattern in which people doubt their accomplishments and
have a persistent, often internalized fear of being exposed as a
“fraud”. This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 19 June
2025. Impostor syndrome, also known as impostor phenomenon or
impostorism, is a psychological experience in which a person suffers
from feelings of intellectual fraudulence.
Jokes:
I’m friends with a rocket, we have a blast together.
I told a pun about rockets, but it didn’t take off.
Rocket scientists always have the best launch parties!
|
